Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
52% positive29 reviewsView price on Amazon
In shortPlayers praise it mainly for easy power in attack, but it is demanding. Several find it stiff or hard to control on blocks and off-centre hits, and some got arm or elbow pain. A few report cracking. Suits strong, aggressive players.
Sort: Most helpfulNewest
A left-side player who moved from a Nox LA10 Quantum 12K to the Metalbone 3.4 Hard looking for raw power, and regretted it. After a few matches they had elbow pain, and the racket felt far too head-heavy to manoeuvre or swing fast on smashes, so they sold it.
“After just a few matches, I started getting elbow pain. On top of that, it felt way too heavy in the head—really difficult to maneuver and hard to accelerate my arm quickly on smashes and aerial shots.”
A week in after moving from a Metalbone Control as they shift to the attacking side. Still adapting, but loves how much it helps their attack at a lower level; plays it without the weight screw.
“la tengo hace una semana y para mi que paso de una metalbone control porque estoy pasando mas al taque me ha encantado, estoy en en rpoceso de adaptacion”
An owner of both the 2025 and 2026 Metalbone HRD says it is one of the best rackets they have tried for ball speed, though its high balance can cause elbow pain for some.
“Yo he tenido la hrd del 25 y del 26 y para ganar velocidad de bola es de lo mejor que he probado”
Played the Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 for about a year but went back to their AT10 18K: they never got used to its extreme trampoline effect, though they miss how easily it produced power.
“I couldn't really get used to the extreme trampoline effect (aka reactiveness) of the Adidas.”
Powerful from the centre but dead off-centre; lobs fall short without perfect technique, and it was hard to control.
“The metalbone was powerfull when you hit in the center, but a wood when not. Every lob you didn’t make perfect motion, was low.”
Coming from a Nox, the power felt unreal; a little less control, which took some getting used to.
“I have been using the metalbone for sometime and would recommend it to anyone who wants power and doesn’t mind losing out on a little control for sure”
Great overheads and touch, but too bouncy from the back and on loose volleys; it also cracked within weeks.
“I love the overhead game and the soft touch game, but I feel like it's a bit too bouncy from the back court”
Plays in Argentina at night in winter around 3 °C. A Bullpadel Hack wrecked their elbow after four uses, while the Metalbone 3.4 HRD has been a luxury; in winter they now switch to the Metalbone CTRL 3.4.
“La hack la use 4 veces me hizo pelota el codo, durisima. La adidas hrd un lujo, ahora en invierno uso igualmente la adidas metalbone ctrl 3.4.”
A professional player found the 2025 Metalbone HRD a disaster: big sweet spot and power, but completely out of control when blocking at the net.
“The Metalbone HRD 2025 was a disaster for me”
A learning curve after the ST4 and AT10 18K, then great control and brilliant power.
“yes its a learning curve but once you get used to it, it's an absolute master class, great control along with brilliant power”
Two months in: superb control, drop shots and volleys when fresh, but inconsistent and punishing on tired days.
“When I’m feeling physically good, the racket is honestly a beauty. The control on groundstrokes is amazing”
Hit with the Metalbone HRD+ for a set: more power but too stiff and unforgiving unless you catch everything clean.
“The Metalbone felt to stiff stiff for my liking. Definitely more power but I found it a bit unforgiving”
Stiff with a good sweet spot and helpful in defence.
“I’m loving it. Racket is amazing. It’s stiff but with a good sweet spot. Helps a lot when in the back defending too”
Six to eight months in and loves it: adapted to the control quickly and values the extra power.
“Own the metalbone HRD 2025. Had it for about 6-8 months now and absolutely love it.”
Good power, but too soft and bouncy for them.
“i tried both the metalbone 3.4 hrd which was good on the power but it was soft and bouncy which i didnt like”
Loved the HRD 3.4's power but it hurt their arm and wrist, so they sold it; their Fenix Pro 5 felt too heavy.
The face broke after four months of normal play; they loved how it played but switched brands over durability.
“I have a metalbone 3.4 hrd, and after 4 months it already broke on the racket face, I’ve never hit the fence or anything.”
Owns both the 2024 and 2025 Metalbone HRD and feels the 2025 one is harder than last year's.
“a la hard la siento mas dura que la del año pasado, y tengo la del 2024 y ahora la del 2025”
Tested the 2025 Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 and really liked its feel; wants an offensive racket with a firm touch.
“I tried the HRD+ 2025 and really liked its feel.”
A tall right-side player who smashes a lot loves their 2025 Metalbone HRD, which has lasted about a year and a half at 2–3 matches a week.
“Currently i'm using a metalbone hrd 2025 and i love it”
An intermediate player who usually plays the 2025 Metalbone HRD+ calls it the best racket they have tried and says it is not as hard as it seems.
“I am an intermediate player and I usually play with a 2025 Metalbone HRD+. Its the best racket I have ever tried. Its not so hard as it seems to be.”
Owned the Metalbone HRD 2025 and found it a very strong racket; countless hits against the glass left it looking like new. Warns against a cracked used copy shown in the post, since that damage means the frame was badly hit.
“I had this racket and it was hell of a strong one. I hit it countless time to the glass and still looks like new.”
A wonderful racket, though they struggle with it in defence.
“I’ve recently switched to the HrD 3.4 and have found it to be a wonderful racket however struggling with defence”
Too much ball output for them in summer, but a perfect winter racket when cold stiffens it.
“I switched mid game to my metalbone hrd 2025 and it was perfect.”
Found the HRD+ 3.4 too heavy and hard to manoeuvre, but blocks were insane and it suits strong, aggressive players.
“the blocks with the racket are insane”
Moved on to the 2025 HRD with no arm problems.
“I switched to the normal Metalbone and later to the HRD (both 2025) and no problems.”
A former tennis player finds the Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 a great racket that suits their game, but gets shoulder pain after playing that worsens the harder they hit.
“So I got the Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 and to be honest it’s a great racket, very well suited to my playing style”
Bought one second-hand and calls it a great racket.
“Ended up getting a second hand Metalbone 3.4HRD which is a great racket.”
So hard their tennis elbow flared after 30 minutes of play.
“since 3.4 HRD+ was soo hard i could feel it after 30 mins of playing”
Of the 29 reviews with a clear verdict, 52% are positive, 31% mixed and 17% negative. The praise mentioned most is easy power. The most common complaint is demanding.
The praise reviewers mention most: easy power (8 reviews), good control (2 reviews) and great on smashes (2 reviews). For example: Coming from a Nox, the power felt unreal; a little less control, which took some getting used to.
The complaints reviewers mention most: demanding (5 reviews), durability issues (3 reviews) and head-heavy (2 reviews). For example: Hit with the Metalbone HRD+ for a set: more power but too stiff and unforgiving unless you catch everything clean.
#8 in Best Padel Rackets 2025, ranked by real player reviews.
29 are quotes from discussions on Reddit, YouTube and Other, each linked to the original post. Player reviews are checked for spam before they appear, and only they count toward the star rating; quotes never do.